🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."